Skip to main content

Build Your Energy Blockchain Application on a Public Blockchain

In a previous post, I talked about the differences between distributed ledgers and blockchains. Another somewhat controversial topic in this space is the debate around public versus private blockchains.  Grid+, a startup attempting to make it possible for consumers to participate directly in energy markets, has a recent blog post called "No Country for Private Blockchains", in which they articulate a good argument for the public blockchain.  They are deploying their solution on Ethereum and feel that the public blockchain approach helps to spread the cost of the shared infrastructure, makes it more secure, and increases value by ensuring that state changes are on the public chain.  Another energy blockchain application startup, PowerLedger, in Australia seems to be taking a hybrid approach using a public+consortium blockchain - for now at least.  Given the high degree of privacy and security that is required to participate in the energy industry today, it's an important decision for any blockchain project that is going to try to disrupt the market.

There are a lot of blockchains out there and many variations of distributed ledgers that are blockchain-like.  Most people know some of the basic characteristics of Ethereum and what makes it special.  At a very basic level, it is a public blockchain that supports smart contracts.  This capability is a crucial differentiation from other blockchains like the Bitcoin blockchain.  An interesting working paper was recently published by Martin Valenta and Philipp Sandner from the Frankfurt School Blockchain Center on this topic as well.  Check out the paper as it does a great job summarizing the publicly available information about Corda, Hyperledger, and Ethereum.  The table below, from the paper, identifies some of the core differences between these blockchains or DLTs:
 Comparison table from "Comparison of Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and Corda" by Valenta and Sander

There are many other differences across these various platforms.  It is critical to understand at a detailed level what the core requirements are for an application and an industry in order to determine the type of blockchain that an application should run on.  For energy blockchain applications, I think it remains to be seen what the key requirements really are, especially since the energy industry is going through such a major shift right now.  What might have been true 5-10 years ago no longer holds, and shouldn't be used as the basis of design decisions going forward.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Power Ledger's play in the energy blockchain space?

Power Ledger is building an energy blockchain platform to connect all of the players of the energy ecosystem together - prosumers, consumers, market operators, utilities, etc. They want to “enable interoperability between diverse market management/pricing mechanisms and units of electricity (kWh) by way of pre-purchased tokens.”  Here's my take on what they are up to. Business Model / Offering Power Ledger's offering is a blockchain-based platform that facilitates participation by “all” parties in the energy ecosystem, called the Platform. Utilities and other 3rd-party businesses that will facilitate trading on the platform are called Application Hosts. Examples of Application Hosts include energy retailers, property managers, and EV-charging businesses. Participants are the consumers or non-Application Hosts and the users. There will or can be an unlimited number of applications that run on the Power Ledger Platform. The first, and only one currently available, is FuseBox...
Post a Comment
Read more

Should you do an ICO?

What is an ICO?  An ICO is an initial coin offering.  The New York Times   recently described ICOs like this: "Imagine that a friend is building a casino and asks you to invest. In exchange, you get chips that can be used at the casino’s tables once it’s finished. Now imagine that the value of the chips isn’t fixed, and will instead fluctuate depending on the popularity of the casino, the number of other gamblers and the regulatory environment for casinos. Oh, and instead of a friend, imagine it’s a stranger on the internet who might be using a fake name, who might not actually know how to build a casino, and whom you probably can’t sue for fraud if he steals your money and uses it to buy a Porsche instead. That’s an I.C.O." ICOs are kind of like blockchain-based Initial Public Offerings (IPO) or crowd-funding campaigns.  The IPO analogy works because, with an ICO, the company offers tokens or coins in exchange for some value, somewhat similar to an IPO where peo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intro Topic: Distributed Ledgers vs. Blockchains

What's the difference between distributed ledgers and blockchains?  "Bits on Blocks" published a brief introduction on this topic earlier this year.  The key takeaways from that article are pretty high level but still helpful when thinking about this.  For example, this: If you want to include all the initiatives going on, use the term “distributed ledgers”. If you mean blockchains, where unrelated transactions are bundled into blocks, which are chained together using hashes and (in most cases) broadcast to all participating entities for batch processing, use “blockchains”. If you like acronyms, use “DLT”: Distributed Ledger Technology Colin Pratt also provided some very interesting detail on this concept along with a discussion on taxonomy in general in his blog post "Thoughts on the Taxonomy of Blockchains & Distributed Ledger Technologies." Colin highlights that Bitcoin's blockchain has some key features that really illustrate what makes it dif...
Post a Comment
Read more