Skip to main content

Build Your Energy Blockchain Application on a Public Blockchain

In a previous post, I talked about the differences between distributed ledgers and blockchains. Another somewhat controversial topic in this space is the debate around public versus private blockchains.  Grid+, a startup attempting to make it possible for consumers to participate directly in energy markets, has a recent blog post called "No Country for Private Blockchains", in which they articulate a good argument for the public blockchain.  They are deploying their solution on Ethereum and feel that the public blockchain approach helps to spread the cost of the shared infrastructure, makes it more secure, and increases value by ensuring that state changes are on the public chain.  Another energy blockchain application startup, PowerLedger, in Australia seems to be taking a hybrid approach using a public+consortium blockchain - for now at least.  Given the high degree of privacy and security that is required to participate in the energy industry today, it's an important decision for any blockchain project that is going to try to disrupt the market.

There are a lot of blockchains out there and many variations of distributed ledgers that are blockchain-like.  Most people know some of the basic characteristics of Ethereum and what makes it special.  At a very basic level, it is a public blockchain that supports smart contracts.  This capability is a crucial differentiation from other blockchains like the Bitcoin blockchain.  An interesting working paper was recently published by Martin Valenta and Philipp Sandner from the Frankfurt School Blockchain Center on this topic as well.  Check out the paper as it does a great job summarizing the publicly available information about Corda, Hyperledger, and Ethereum.  The table below, from the paper, identifies some of the core differences between these blockchains or DLTs:
 Comparison table from "Comparison of Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and Corda" by Valenta and Sander

There are many other differences across these various platforms.  It is critical to understand at a detailed level what the core requirements are for an application and an industry in order to determine the type of blockchain that an application should run on.  For energy blockchain applications, I think it remains to be seen what the key requirements really are, especially since the energy industry is going through such a major shift right now.  What might have been true 5-10 years ago no longer holds, and shouldn't be used as the basis of design decisions going forward.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Problem with DERs?

I have spent more than 15 years working to advance distributed energy resources (DERs), at this point, and it's clear that DERs are technologically to the point where they have been proven time and time again and can be relied on like any other utility or grid assets.  However, it's still very difficult to monetize the value that DERs can provide because there are not mechanisms in place, in most energy markets, to compensate them for what they can do.  For startups that are trying to commercialize services that can be provided by distributed energy storage systems like orchestrated behind-the-meter load control and/or solar+storage, it's very frustrating to know that these products can perform as well as traditional utility grid assets, but can't be paid for doing so. The next area of innovation in clean energy must focus on solving this problem.  The technology barriers are not what they once were.  DER hardware and software are advanced enough to provide consis...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is Power Ledger's play in the energy blockchain space?

Power Ledger is building an energy blockchain platform to connect all of the players of the energy ecosystem together - prosumers, consumers, market operators, utilities, etc. They want to “enable interoperability between diverse market management/pricing mechanisms and units of electricity (kWh) by way of pre-purchased tokens.”  Here's my take on what they are up to. Business Model / Offering Power Ledger's offering is a blockchain-based platform that facilitates participation by “all” parties in the energy ecosystem, called the Platform. Utilities and other 3rd-party businesses that will facilitate trading on the platform are called Application Hosts. Examples of Application Hosts include energy retailers, property managers, and EV-charging businesses. Participants are the consumers or non-Application Hosts and the users. There will or can be an unlimited number of applications that run on the Power Ledger Platform. The first, and only one currently available, is FuseBox...
Post a Comment
Read more

Democratizing Energy Markets

Audrey Zibelman, former NYPSC chair, Jon Wellinghoff, former FERC chair, and others in the industry have described visions where distributed energy resources (DERs) are plentiful and active contributors to a dynamic and efficient grid of the future. Though the technical capabilities of DERs to provide valuable services to the grid have been proven, market and regulatory barriers exist which prevent DERs from being able to monetize the value they provide. Currently, the tools and processes in place in the industry to securely manage contracts, transactions, and settlements are not positioned to be applied to many small DERs and it would be prohibitively expensive to do so. A mechanism for efficiently, cost effectively, and securely managing the contracts, transactions, and settlement activities of many DER participants in near-real time is needed to make it practical for DERs to contribute to grid management on a large scale. There are several key elements that need to be...
Post a Comment
Read more